Kids are invited to celebrate Earth Day by recording themselves singing a pledge to protect the planet.
In celebration of the 50th Anniversary of Earth Day*, we are creating a virtual choir of young people in grades K-12 who will perform The Promise Song virtually. The Promise Song is an anthem for the Earth, simple to learn, but profound in its message. We’ve had to cancel all of our in-person events, but want to give young people a chance to share their voice and their love for the Earth in a positive way.
If you have children or grandchildren, we’d love for them to learn The Promise Song, record themselves on a phone, and send the video recording to us. If not, please forward this e-mail to parents, music teachers, choral directors….anyone who could get this opportunity to students.
In order to complete this by Earth Day 2020, we need all recordings by Monday, April 13th!
Here’s more information about the virtual choir, an .mp3 recording of The Promise Song (which students will use to practice and record) and the musical score for The Promise Song.
Upload your file at this link: https://forms.gle/pHPWNrruuYpm2RhE6
A parent or guardian will need to sign a permission slip. Return this permission slip to [email protected].North Woods and Waters of the St. Croix Heritage Area is coordinating activities to celebrate Earth Day, as Senator Gaylord Nelson, Father of Earth Day, was born and raised in Clear Lake, WI, within the St. Croix River watershed!
Kids for Saving Earth is an international organization, located in North Branch, MN. Tessa and William Hill wrote the words to The Promise Song to honor their son, Clint, who had formed a group called Kids for Saving Earth before he died at age 11. The words were set to music by Ronnie Brooks and produced by Hummingbird Productions © 1990. Kids for Saving Earth became an international organization and The Promise Song was performed on Broadway (by Raffi) and at the United Nations.
Reconsider the amount of lawn fertilizers and pesticides that you use, as they eventually end up in our rivers and lakes which can cause nuisance algae blooms and deplete oxygen.
Use minimal washing machine/dishwasher soaps. Check the bottle, as with today’s efficient washing machines, it takes very little soap. Better yet, consider earth-friendly brands.
Make your own disinfectants which are better for the environment than many commercial products. For example, Earth Day Network suggests you can make disinfectant by mixing 30% hydrogen peroxide and 70% alcohol in a spray bottle. Simply spray and let it dry on the surface.
If you live on a lake or river, think about adding plants or trees near the water. It’s a win-win situation because they are nice to look at and they help protect the water supply from pollutants by intercepting rain and filtering runoff.
To avoid water pollution, do not dispose of oils, grease, fat or chemicals down the sink. Flushing pills or medications can also pollute groundwater and surface water.
Use less single-use plastic, as too much of it ends up in our waters. It doesn’t break down and causes pollution, danger to plants and water life. Even if it’s recycled, that still is plastic in another form and the process can release plastic irritants.
Walleye are a staple of Native American diets, beloved for Friday night fish fries and a popular sporting fish. But the cool-water fish’s populations have been declining for decades, at the same time as largemouth bass have been thriving. Experts say climate change isn’t the only driver of walleye’s decline — but its impact is pervasive. In this series, WPR is exploring how the state can adapt to and mitigate the affect climate change is having on some of Wisconsin’s most iconic foods.
Arguably the most prized fish in Wisconsin, walleye hold a cultural significance that reaches far beyond being a thrilling fish to catch and a delicious fish to eat for the spear fishers and recreational anglers who harvest them.
But walleye populations have been declining for the better part of two decades.
While walleye at a Friday night fish fry haven’t come from Wisconsin in many years, they remain an important food source and tradition for Wisconsin tribes and part of an economically significant pastime — recreational fishing brings in more than $2 billion annually to the state.
Estimates say the sharp tooth predator’s production dropped nearly 30 percent between 1990 and 2012 and takes 1.5 times as long to grow to the same size and weight as it did in 1990.
The Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission (GLIFWC) identified walleye as a moderately to extremely vulnerable species in Wisconsin in its recent vulnerability assessment report.
What's driving their decline?
Researchers point to climate change as a pervasive culprit, but it’s a complicated story with a lot of question marks.
Lakes are complex ecosystems and Wisconsin is home to a diverse variety — lake size and depth, water clarity and surrounding tree cover all influence how lakes respond to climate change.
And temperature affects every corner of a lake ecosystem.
Researchers know Wisconsin lakes aren’t too warm for walleye, a cool-water fish, to survive. They suspect it's a recruitment (surviving to maturity) issue that has more to do with food sources and what species has the competitive edge.
Fishing in northern Wisconsin for walleye. USFWS Midwest Region (CC BY 2.0)
Challenges In Early Life
Just how rising temperatures and shorter winters are affecting walleye reproduction is an open research question, Gretchen Hansen, assistant professor in the Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, said, but it’s clear the first summer of a walleye’s life is the most precarious.
The walleye hatch early in the summer, but by the end of the summer large numbers have disappeared — what happened between those events has confounded researchers.
"We don't know what happened to them, but they just don't show up anymore," Hansen said. "Maybe they didn't find enough food, or they got eaten or some combination of both."
Timing is everything. Hansen said there are theories that young walleye aren’t matching up with their food source at the correct time because of changing lake ice patterns, driven by an increase in erratic warm and cold snaps during winter and spring.
"You get better reproduction when … you have kind of a solid straight path towards spring," Hansen said. "Not super variable temperature conditions, and we are seeing more variable conditions with climate change."
David Bissonette, a Lac Courte Oreilles Tribe member and spear fisher, said spear fishers see lakes in a different way than others. They go out at night, with headlamps, in the springtime right after the ice melts.
When Bissonette was a kid, he associated walleye harvesting on Lake Chetac in Sawyer County with his cousin’s birthday, April 19, he said.
"But now ... we've gone after that first week in April," Bissonette said. "And then there also have been a couple times where we haven't really been able to fish until the end of April."
Walleye in Wisconsin generally spawn between mid-April and early May, and when the timing has been off, he hasn’t reached his walleye quota, he said.
Shift In Balance Of Power
At the same time walleye are struggling, another predator species appears to be thriving: the largemouth bass.
Small changes in temperature have a big impact, said Hansen.
"The thing with climate change is everything is affected by temperature — like everything," she said.
"The thing with climate change is everything is affected by temperature — like everything," said Gretchen Hansen, assistant professor in the Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities.
But exactly how those changes in temperature affect walleye habitat and reproduction are difficult to tease out. That’s the nature of climate change, she said, it isn’t straightforward.
Wisconsin has already warmed by about 2 degrees Fahrenheit since 1950, and is expected to rise an additional 2 to 8 degrees Fahrenheit by 2050. Increases in extreme and unpredictable weather events and seasonal variability have already shown themselves to be side effects of climate change.
Lake warming based on modeled lake temperature from 1980-2014. Graph from the U.S. Geological Survey and researchers Gretchen Hansen, Jordan Read, Luke Winslow and Jon Hansen
Water temperatures are slower to rise, but some Wisconsin lakes have seen temperatures increase by more than 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit since 1980. And as water temperatures continue to climb, a relatively small number of lakes are expected to support walleye natural reproduction.
The same temperature changes that are making natural reproduction more risky for walleye are tipping the scales in favor of largemouth bass.
Walleye have a competitive advantage in low-light, stained water with limited plant growth. Largemouth bass thrive in warm water and prefer clear water with an abundance of aquatic vegetation.
And while it may not be intuitive, rising temperatures are tied to clearer lakes — warmer and clearer lakes force walleye to swim deeper to be comfortable and reduce their habitat and range for food.
Largemouth bass will likely become more abundant as the climate changes, said Aaron Shultz, climate change inland fisheries biologist at GLIFWC.
But to date, there’s no direct evidence walleye’s decline comes down to competition between the two predator species.
"They are also a top predator in the system," Shultz said of largemouth bass. "Are they consuming juvenile walleye? Are they competing with them for food? A combination of those things? It's unclear at this point what their role is."
Statewide trends for walleye natural reproduction and largemouth bass relative abundance. Graph from the U.S. Geological Survey and researchers Gretchen Hansen, Jordan Read, Luke Winslow and Jon Hansen
A River Species
You could also take a step back and begin to understand walleye decline in Wisconsin lakes by looking to their natural habitat — rivers and large lakes connected to river systems.
"We've introduced them through stocking into a lot of lakes," said Greg Sass, fisheries research team lead in the state Department of Natural Resources Office of Applied Science.
"Some of what we're seeing with these declines might just be that these lakes weren't supposed to have walleyes in the first place," he continued.
"Some of what we're seeing with these declines might just be that these lakes weren't supposed to have walleyes in the first place," said Greg Sass, fisheries research team lead in the state Department of Natural Resources Office of Applied Science.
Then, there’s habitat loss on the lakes. Bissonette, of Lac Courte Oreilles Tribe, points to how lakefront properties are managed, like removing shoreline trees and aquatic plants.
"People want ... to change it to how they want it without understanding this lake has been like this for thousands and thousands of years, and the fish that were in here developed in that environment," he said. "But you don’t want to catch a gar, you want to catch a walleye."
Greg Sass. Photo courtesy of Sass
But it isn’t all bad news for walleye.
Walleye are doing fine in large Wisconsin rivers, and even in a number of lakes walleye populations are holding their own, particularly in large lakes, which hold more resources, and lakes that are connected to rivers.
And the lakes they appear to be doing best in tend to be the largest and most popular lakes in the state, such as Escanaba Lake in Vilas County or Lake Winnebago in east central Wisconsin.
Walleye populations have been maintained through stocking in many lakes in Wisconsin. But the level of success varies significantly — some lake ecosystems support natural reproduction without help, for others, the only way to have walleye is to stock them.
"Then there's a whole bunch of lakes in between where if conditions are right — if you have a good winter and ice-off is right and the temperature is good — you'll probably get natural reproduction," Hansen said.
"But maybe that’s only happening every 10 years or something, and that's not enough to support fishing," she continued.
Since 2013, the Wisconsin Walleye Initiative has spent millions of dollars stocking hundreds of thousands of walleye each year.
But stocking isn’t without critics, and research shows stocked lakes see larger declines in walleye production. Between 1990 and 2012, lakes with both natural reproduction and stocking declined by 47 percent and lakes with only stocking declined by 63 percent.
"To me ... you're putting in a lot of effort in many of these systems just to have a put-and-take fishery," Shultz said. "It's a bandaid fix to whatever the larger issue is in the system."
However, Shultz said as part of a more comprehensive management plan, stocking can be successful in rehabilitating the system.
According to the U.S. Geological Survey report on climate change and freshwater fish, walleye won’t completely disappear from Wisconsin waterways even under extreme warming conditions. However, a comparatively smaller number of lakes will be able to support naturally reproducing walleye populations.
When it comes to climate change there's a lot of talk of species moving north as temperatures change — but don't expect a lockstep northward march of species, said Jack Williams, a University of Wisconsin-Madison expert on ecological responses to climate change.
"Each species is differentially sensitive to different aspects of climate change," he said. "Some are sensitive to water temperature, some are sensitive to spring thaws."
"Every species is kind of moving at its own rate in its own direction and influenced in different ways by the species around it ... but we should expect lots of surprises and unique wrinkles as we see the coming decades play out," Williams continued.
If you enjoy bass fishing, times are good. But there’s resistance and few people are focused on bass as an alternative fish to catch and eat — even as regulations for harvesting bass have loosened, Shultz said.
Bass don’t face the same harvesting pressure as walleye do. Whether that’s contributing to walleye’s decline, experts say it could be playing a role, but it’s likely not the driving factor.
"In the particular case of bass, most anglers are releasing all bass right now, even if they are legal sized," Sass said. "That also kind of gives bass an upper hand as well, anglers aren't keeping them like they are walleyes."
"As the lakes change, we'll still eat those other fish. But I feel really bad for who's going to come after us because they're not even going to understand what has been lost," said David Bissonette, a Lac Courte Oreilles member and spear fisher.
Bass don’t hold the same cultural status as walleye do. And as lake ecosystems continue to change, that will likely come up more and more in the future, Shultz said.
"The public, they still want to be able to harvest walleye, that's what you go to the Northwoods to do," Shultz said. "For tribes, it's a tradition to go spearing in the springtime. And that's subsistence for the tribes ... it's part of ceremonies, it’s a tradition, it’s part of the culture."
According to the Ojibwe creation story, there’s an order to how things were created, Bissonette said.
"The first one was the earth. And then after that plants, and then animals and fish and then humans are created last," he said. "Walleye fits into that ... with all of these other beings that exist in the Ojibwe world — they don't need us, you know, we need them."
All fish taste different, Bissonette said, and Ojibwe people have always adapted to the environment.
"As the lakes change, we'll still eat those other fish," he said. "But I feel really bad for who's going to come after us because they're not even going to understand what has been lost."
Each district as classified allows certain permitted uses while other uses require a conditional use permit. Obtaining a conditional use permit requires an application and fee, a public hearing and a determination. Application is made to the zoning administrator, who refers it to the land use and information committee. The committee schedules the public hearing and determines whether to grant the permit.
Secondly, he asked whether ag zoning districts should be evaluated based on factors such as soils, depth to groundwater, slopes, proximity to surface water, dwellings or other buildings and existing land cover.